To be fair to the Globe, this was not their venture. The venture belonged to an outfit called Good Chance - but it was their actors and actresses.
Digressing, I wonder whether the appointment of a new artistic director at the Globe, a director (rather directress) who was alleged in the pub to have practically made a boast of knowing nothing of Shakespeare, was another error of judgement.
Observations from the Guardian like 'particularly at the Globe where the World Shakespeare season demonstrated that Shakespeare really can be our contemporary when we don’t treat the plays as sacred literary texts but possibilities for performance' do not encourage me. Nor do snippets from the Kneehigh Theatre (where the new director earned her spurs) like '... Proudly, we now find ourselves celebrated as one of Britain's most exciting touring theatre companies. We create vigorous, popular theatre for a broad spectrum of audiences, using a multi-talented group of performers, directors, designers, sculptors, engineers, musicians and writers. We use a wide range of art forms and media as our ‘tool kit' to make new and accessible forms of theatre. A spontaneous sense of risk and adventure produces extraordinary dramatic results. Themes are universal and local, epic and domestic'.
The Globe is already quite good at song & dance and getting bums on seats. But are they keeping their eye on the Shakespearian ball?
PS: at least Past Master Brown, made a sensible contribution to the debate about managing the migration to come last week. Perhaps in the very same edition of the Guardian as headlined 'Hamlet goes to Calais'.
No comments:
Post a Comment